when people said this same thing, like .. word for word .. about the previous president/party going after habeas corpus, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, right to assemble, freedom of the press, etc etc everyone was -way- more dismissive of it and all these people up in arms now “ZOMG THEY’S TRAMPLIN MAH RAIHTS!” were bizzarely silent. Why is that? Where was the worry about hidden agendas?

I do think it’s a bit overly alarmist. Like those few recent shootings I’ve read about where people shot police officers scared that the gub’mint was tramplin’ raihts and trying to take their guns.

It is my feeling that there is a hidden agenda to do this. Of course no politician has ever said they advocate a total ban / confiscation, but this is the same group of politicians who are slowly stripping the right from us all for completely bogus reasons. Look at the DC gun ban? What about Chicago? I will drop the subject when they demonstrate some other intention.

Ant hill? I’m trying to post my concerns about this… If you take it as alarmist? So be it. At least I can say I did something about it.

I’m … shocked … that you posted something from glen beck in a not-mocking-him-into-oblivion context, the man clearly has rabies or some other higher-judgment-impacting ailment.

I really dont know where your getting this “confiscation agenda” stuff, but it’s total BS. Nobody … -n o b o d y- … who currently holds elected office in the US federal government has stated firearm confiscation as an objective.

Dear anthill, stop trying to be Mt. Fuji.